A seminar was held on 25 April in the South Sun City in south-west of the Province of Hanoi to analyse in depth the social causes, ideologies and realistic paths behind the phenomenon of “burning out”. At the meeting, seven expert scholars held in-depth discussions on media helping urban IP formation, brainstorming, and made many constructive suggestions.
The furnace has been bagged, the soul burns three sets. The marketing of events, which are supposed to be “go-and-be” has not been envisaged as an example of a phenomenon that is “more than one wave”. In response, many cities are thinking on the subject.
Two recent heat raids on the phenomenon of embarrassing: first, the spike in hotels on the eve of “five”, the throwing of the throes of the throw, the throne Government took the lead in demanding that “more than 50 per cent of the float should be detected at the price of the stick”; and secondly, when it was expected that during the “five” period, passenger traffic would exceed the capacity to receive, the trousers “s of glasses should be able to do everything”.
As compared with the cross-border “by spelling” of local commissaries in the area of short videos at the beginning of the year, perhaps consumers are more happy to see thousands of businessmen in good faith and character for “filtration” services. It was said that there were “highers” behind the blog. A small batch has made it an incalculable large business, a ring of “flammatory” and, in short, a four-size-fits-all model. However, it does not seem to be particularly plausible: the local sector simply does everything it can to do its part, manages businesses, throws resources, safeguards, turns network flows into “retentions” under the line, and makes the “time phenomenon” a “market brand”. The attitude was positive and humane, and the slogan came out.
To be objectively said, in the canton market, the throw is not uniquely “perfected”: in humanities, it does not catch up with small cities; in nature, it is no more than sand beaches; and even in a marked glossary, it is also the “dominance” of the city of North-East night, and, in so doing? This is not only a matter of “seminars” to think, but of cities that want to “repeated operations”. For consumers, there is no “one twenty-three to five” hard nuclear justification, but there is only one of the most basic logic: who is the owner and who is willing to spend there. Behind a “long business” or “save one vote”, the question was first made clear.
“The Quartet eats, but smokestoves.” It is not so much that we eat, but rather a embarrassed, hypothetical mildating of children. There are many stories of cities, even in terms of the dialectic law, where each city can find its own “sales” and how it can better tap into the traditional culture of local excellence, conserving the humanities of the citizenry, upgrading the soft power of the city — these do not lie in the Wallis, nor are they shouted on the verb of the meeting, but in the unusual business of the street, highlighting the “boy” between tourists and the city. It is most difficult for everyone to take ownership of their own city and for everyone to turn their tourists into their own development.
The urban competition for high-quality development requires a more pragmatic “blue sea mindset”: it leaves itself out of the infrared sea of low-end competition, standing at the epidemi of the larger market, with a history-based, popular, socio-democratic, public-governance capacity. The phenomenon is not replicable and experience is worth learning. It is expected that more cities will be targeted, resilient and able to find a path suitable for their own “breaks” that sows unique values.
Source: China Youth Report
28 April 2023