Hey folks, after we officially came out of stealth last month -- see tweet below, we’ve had lots of inbound and interest in working with us. Some notable teams we are exploring collaboration opportunities with include Balancer, KeeperDAO, Uniswap, FEI, Llama, and Rift. Each of these teams adds immense value to our ultimate vision to become the go-to AMM for both time-insensitive traders and passive LPs.
Unlike atomic (one block) trades happening on AMMs today, we expect the trades on TWAMM to be particularly advantageous to long-term investors such as DAOs, funds, etc, and retail who are interested in utilizing DCA to enter/exit positions. Additionally, passive LPs who’ve been craving for a full range AMM since UNI V3 can now park their liquidity in TWAMM pools to earn significant returns without active management.
Much of our focus this month has been on quantifying TWAMM’s behavior related to gas usage at a high level. We discuss the effects of the block interval parameterization below along with our initial approach to high-level contract optimizations.
executeVirtualOrders
when different OBIs are used for TWAMM pools, illustrating the inverse relationship between the number of iterations needed and OBI.You can see a much more detailed post with the various scenario analysis here:
We had a lot of other work to share this past month but wanted to keep the updates manageable. Look for more updates in mid-March including:
Gas Denial of Service (GDoS)
scenarios for TWAMM.Beyond these updates, there will be a more detailed analysis of other important TWAMM topics relating to numerical stability, arithmetic errors, and the tradeoffs inherent in contract gas usage optimizations.