Today, 78% of creators rely on brand-partnerships as their primary revenue source. To keep their income flowing, they must oversee every aspect of their business from sales to legal, production, and finance. The harsh reality is that most creators spend more time in their back-office than on all other aspects of their business combined.
As many of you know, this problem is very close to me and, especially, my co-founder, Samantha.
Sam had quit her full-time marketing role at Canada’s largest luxury retailer to fulfill her goal of being a professional creator. After growing her audience to 30k, nurturing relationships with brands, and developing a reputation for quality content, she quickly reached, and then surpassed the income she was making in her former day-job — all through brand partnerships.
This is every creator’s dream come true and millions of creators aspire to follow in Sam’s footsteps. However, despite all of her success, Sam was on the road to burnout and on the brink of giving up.
After knowing each other for years and hearing dozens of similar stories from Sam’s peers, we decided to team up to fix the creator back-office. Earlier this year, we launched Clout Jam, a tool that used machine learning to take unstructured data from a creator’s inbox and transform it into actionable insights and organized CRM records.
Our hypothesis was that by removing ambiguity and surfacing the right information at the right time, we can take the pain out of back-office management, help creators win more brand deals, and enable them to earn more revenue.
In the first 6 months since launching, we analyzed 20k messages, documents, and contracts between creators and brands, only to find that mission-critical information, like content specifications, usage permissions, and key deadlines was often missing from transactional correspondence.
This was a discouraging find. After all — how can creators be expected to meet deadlines that weren’t communicated? How can they produce content to specifications that are not defined?
The short answer is: they can’t.
The “back-office problem” for creators is not so simple. Yes, creators are constrained by their ability to process the overwhelming volume of transactional data arriving in their inboxes, but the real problem is something much bigger and more insidious.
Sponsored content from smaller creators outperforms trad digital by 10x, and larger creators’ content by 4x. This makes sense — smaller communities tend to be more authentic, more intimate, and more engaged than larger ones. I’ve seen this first hand, with Sam personally replying to hundreds DM’s from members of her community on any given day (it’s hard to imagine a Kardashian doing the same).
Although a few years ago marketers could work with a handful of influencers, today brands seek better performance by transacting with hundreds, sometimes thousands of creators at a time.
Obviously, the manual processes designed around dealing w/ 1–5 creators do not work when you are activating hundreds of influencers. Every deal is a one-off and requires negotiating dozens of commercial parameters, which consume countless hours of back and forth and make contract management lifecycles nearly impossible.
It’s hard to imagine anyone with less empathy towards the realities of running a creator business than the legal teams who are responsible for drafting influencer campaign agreements for Fortune 500 marketers. As a consequence, these agreements tend to be inadequate and highly asymmetrical.
Most are repurposed from antiquated freelancers agreements and not remotely suited to define or enforce the terms of engagement between marketers and creators. In addition to being exhaustively long, they are filled with complex legalese and irrelevant requirements. Nearly all of these agreements lack terms essential to the fulfillment of a creator’s responsibilities. Things like production timelines, revision procedures, and content usage rights are either absent or entirely unreasonable.
As a result, it’s nearly impossible for creators to negotiate for their interests without outside legal assistance, which is prohibitively expensive in most cases. Instead, they end up signing terms that take significant value and leverage off the table.
Numerous and largely undifferentiated, it should come as no surprise that tools built to maximize activation volume and minimize content costs do not have creators’ best interest in mind.
Systems designed into most marketer-facing products demonstrate little understanding of creator workflows, or respect to their profession. There’s no better evidence than in their email practices, which value quantity over quality and conformity over customization.
In savvy attempts to maximize their access to demand, many creators often sign-up for a handful of these platforms early in their careers. Every new opportunity, regardless of its value is placed in the same queue - the inbox. Within weeks, creators who choose this path are spammed by hundreds of low-value opportunities each week. When it comes to a creator’s inbox, signal is impossible to identify through all the noise.
Finally, let’s take a look at the flow of money through the ecosystem, which leaves a lot to be desired — especially for creators. What follows is the sequence of events required for a creator to get paid after collaborating with a brand via agency.
The steps to getting paid:
There’s a lot wrong with this equation, but the first thing is time-to-payment. At best, it takes creators over 1.5 months from completing work to getting paid. At worst, it takes a minimum of half a year. Clearly, there’s room for improvement here.
Secondly, creators are still getting paid via paper check (yes, you read that correctly). Why would marketers prefer such an antiquated payment method? It comes down to two things:
1). The legal structure of most creator businesses
2). Agency cash flows
Most nano- and micro-creators are not incorporated as businesses. As a consequence, marketers must go outside of their normal process and cut checks to each creator for each campaign. The vendor payment and TRP systems that agency AP teams typically use to pay vendor invoices simply don’t work outside b2b use cases.
Now let’s look at agency cash flows. It’s hard for agencies to pay for campaign costs incurred on behalf of their clients that are yet-to-be paid by brands. Although manual, cutting, and sending paper checks by mail gives agencies another 7–30 days to recoup their costs from clients, providing a much-needed buffer to prevent checks from bouncing.
The industry is either at a breaking point, or an inflection point. We believe it’s the latter.
Today marks the first day of a new chapter for our team and the next phase of our journey as founders. Clout Jam (as we knew it) is dead.
I am proud to introduce Cloutdesk, the first platform that helps the 50 million creators connect, collaborate, and transact with the 10 million digital marketers around the planet.
The launch of Cloutdesk is the just first phase of building the infrastructure layer for creator marketing.
Our mission is to create a more open, equitable, and efficient marketplace for creator partnerships.
If you share in our vision and are curious to learn how you can get involved, drop me a note at email@example.com.