Remember the amusement park analogy? Rides 🚋 are like different networks/protocols and the Safety Instructors 🦺 are analogous to AVS (Actively Validated Services).
Protocols which cannot be validated or proven on EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) cannot use Ethereum’s security pool. AVS helps in solving for this by bootstrapping trust through LSTs & LRTs.
Restaking involves staking ETH on multiple networks simultaneously, for higher rewards and ensuring security to these networks. This is done through the use of LSTs (Liquid Staking Tokens) and LRTs (Liquid Restaking Tokens). 🪙
LSTs are the token that you receive after staking native ETH with Liquidity Staking Protocols. While, LRTs are the token that you receive after restaking the ETH or the LSTs.
Enough of the context, Restaking Providers, also known as operators are responsible for staking ETH on behalf of the users, providing economic security and capabilities.
Validating Transactions
In order to validate the transactions, without building own security/validator network.
The Restaking Provider enables with the infrastructure and software for the AVS to validate the transactions.
Decentralization
Economic Security
Additional Rewards
Slashing
AVSs also needed some governance to control the validation of invalid transactions. And EigenLayer being based on PoS consensus mechanism had that advantage, so came the concept of Slashing in AVSs as well.
Hence, the need for Restaking Provider.
The world is not all pink, but yellow (sorry Barbie)! 😉
What I mean is while Restaking Providers are providing with numerous benefits, there are some risks as well.
Risks involve slashing conditions, discontinuity of the restaking provider or their project, failure of the Ethereum or the base layer protocol. 😓