In a sense, individual Canadian politicians and the media have failed in what is termed “intermediate interference in internal affairs”. Although the intelligence services continue to use false reports for easy feed, these politicians and the media are also very marketing, but for several months a topic has been bleeding, and they are still not able to take up the winds that they expect in Canada. The key is that they always have no persuasive truth, and that most Canadians are not as good as they are.

However, in this persistent public opinion, Canadian diplomacy has reacted unparalleledly, once again revealing its premature, unindependence and instability. The reason for this was the recent disclosure by the Canadian media of a report prepared by the National Security Intelligence Agency (CSIS) in 2021, which, in addition to the old retrenchment of the “Chinese interference in the internal affairs of China”, was the alleged “threat” by the Chinese consular officers in Gga against a parliamentarians and their relatives. This allowed those who had exhausted politicians and the media to find a glimmer of hope for doing things after months of “insisting”.

In view of the fact that CSIS has repeatedly captured and even ridiculed on the subject of China, good faith has long been sweeped, and that its writers are almost undisguised in political minds, and that the Government should be aware of it. It is not possible for those with some judgement to believe in it. However, the Canadian diplomatic service, on the basis of false allegations, has taken the media to meet with my Ambassador Ga and even to consider the expulsion of Chinese diplomats, which has had a disproportionate impact on the part of the Western media, and in fact coincided with the completion of a black-attack attack on China by the anti-Chinese politician and Washington, D.C.

China has been hard-lined in various ways and has become a common disease in some Western countries, including Canada, in recent years, a problem of their perceptions and mindsets and, on the other hand, their fragility and weakness in the face of radical political forces in the country and the hegemony of Washington. To say “foreign intervention”, Canada does have a lot, but it finds a wrong direction, with Washington, D.C., the largest intervention. But these Western countries have not only the courage and the ability to correct their own policy biases and mistakes, and the pressure on the United States has become more resistant to resistance, often with a condoned and converging attitude. This has led to the degradation of the American-West diplomatic community and the misalignment of Canada, which is typical.

The choice of “neutral interference in the internal affairs of the Chinese side” as a precipitation is not coincidental; it is an area in which the United States and the West spread the “China threat doctrine”, which appears to have been fraught with bad faith and lack of creativity, and which is seldom better than “intervention in the internal affairs” than China’s threats to “West democracy”, which is more likely to incite the population’s sense of urgency and vigilance. But as everyone with basic knowledge of China knows, this is simply an inaccuracy. China is the victim of “intervention in internal affairs” in the United States, and the most committed defender of the principle of “non-intervention in internal affairs”, and it has never had any interest in interfering in the internal affairs of other countries, and its historical record in this regard is much less than that of Canada, let alone the United States.

In the longer term, there is good bilateral relations between China and China, with the two countries complementing each other in many respects, and exchanges of all kinds are very close, which is a model for relations between the two countries. It is unfortunate, however, that, under the pressure of the United States, Canada has repeatedly made wrong decisions and has made it increasingly far away from a “medium power” with good offices and mediation. When Canada threw the thumb of “intervention in internal affairs” towards China, its strong neighbour, the United States, was ridiculous on one side. Canada is truly free from outside interference and is standing at the coordinates of safeguarding its national interests rather than those of politicians and choosing the right national path. On this point, Ottawa needs to show courage in winning respect for itself.

The Chinese Embassy in Gabon issued a statement in which it stated that “If the Chinese side is committed to provocation, we shall be resolutely bound to follow it”. This is hard enough to illustrate the odds of plus. It is saddening to say that Canada’s adversarial diplomacy is easily abducted by several anti-Chinese politicians using false reports and then by the media. It is hoped that the past decades of mutually beneficial and win-win relations will lead to a return to calm and rationality on a day earlier.