Base, Coinbase’s Layer 2 blockchain built on Optimism’s OP Stack, is poised to revolutionize the Ethereum scaling landscape. As a bridge to mass adoption, it offers faster, cheaper transactions and a platform for decentralized applications (dApps). However, one major component is missing: a native token.
It’s understandable that Coinbase is treading cautiously given its ongoing skirmishes with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over regulatory clarity in the crypto space. But when viewed in light of Optimism’s success with its own OP token, the question arises — why not Base?
Here’s why Base should reconsider its token strategy:
Optimism has navigated regulatory challenges, launching OP while avoiding SEC complications by emphasizing its governance utility. Base could follow this path, leveraging the token for governance while minimizing speculative risks.
Developers could be rewarded for building critical infrastructure or decentralized applications. Validators could stake the token to secure the network and process Layer 2 transactions, enhancing security and reliability. Optimism’s OP token model includes these mechanisms, creating a vibrant ecosystem where participation is rewarded. Without a token, Base risks missing out on this opportunity to rapidly expand its network through incentivized development.
Tokens also enable cross-chain liquidity, allowing users to easily move assets between Layer 1 and Layer 2 networks. In the case of Base, this could strengthen its position as a trusted Ethereum scaling solution, giving users and developers more reasons to engage with the network.
Optimism has already made strides in this direction, using the OP token to shift control away from the core team toward its community. For Base, a token would be an essential step toward achieving similar decentralization and fostering greater autonomy.
This value capture model would fuel more innovation. Optimism has shown that projects with token economies are able to scale faster, attract more developers, and create richer ecosystems of dApps and services.
Optimism’s success has demonstrated that a well-structured token economy can incentivize network effects, bringing in not just retail users but institutions and long-term developers who want to build on a robust, decentralized platform. Base has the same potential, but it requires a native token to fully realize it.
Addressing the SEC Hurdle It’s true that Coinbase’s battle with the SEC looms large. A token launch could invite scrutiny from regulators, particularly if the token is perceived as a security. However, Coinbase is uniquely positioned to handle this challenge:
Coinbase’s regulatory experience gives it the tools to launch a utility or governance token in compliance with existing frameworks. By focusing the token’s utility on governance, staking, and liquidity provisioning — rather than speculative purposes — Base can reduce the regulatory risks. Following the precedent set by Optimism, Base can introduce a token that emphasizes network utility and community empowerment. Conclusion Despite the regulatory challenges, deploying a native token for Base would enhance its governance, incentivize key stakeholders, and accelerate the growth of its ecosystem. Optimism’s OP token serves as proof that tokens can coexist with the current regulatory environment, as long as they are thoughtfully designed. If Base wants to be a long-term leader in Ethereum scaling, a native token is not just an option — it’s a necessity.
Base should seize this opportunity to fuel its decentralized vision and establish a thriving Layer 2 economy. The right token strategy, paired with Coinbase’s regulatory insight, could propel Base to new heights while remaining compliant in a rapidly evolving landscape.