Ahh, here we are one more time. Staring into the vastness of the void. What is a coin, my lover from Marseille once asked me? Is a coin a means of exchange, a utility for a thing, a gambling chip or a fragment of a dream in a non-linear setting?

A coin by definition that we will etch into the collective memory today is a way to define our hierarchy in a dynamically created society of energy, money and abstract anon-ish social networks.

By definition, life is entropy. We buy an ice cream cone and we can eat it and the energy is transferred to our physical body or we can observe the thing and the thing will cease to exist. Therefore, we would likely assume that all things degrade and get less over time and us as beings we are forced to constantly transfer energy to keep something as it was when we first received it. Coins, tokens on the other hand, could be defined as more neutral things. One coin is always one coin and has a relative value on the market to be exchanged for other coins. This value is based on things such as supply of the coin, interest in the coin and wealth of those interested in the coin.

Supply is an interesting thing. If we look at Bitcoin, there are just twenty-one million of these ever possible and therefore the value of a bitcoin depends on interest (and wealth) of parties vs. supply of Bitcoin. If we take Shiba Inu for example, there are billions and billions of these available so even if it had more interest than Bitcoin, still the price of such likely would never even reach one dollar.

(Juxtaposed, the current price of Bitcoin is over sixty thousand dollars at the time of publishing.)

So we come to the conclusion that supply does not matter, except for the perception of owning MANY vs owning a FEW, even though MANY or a FEW theoretically could be exchanged at the same value to another coin.

Burn and Everything After

Wen Burn, that sexbot will ask. Does a burn matter? sending coins to a wallet with forever unrecoverable keys (lest there is a better supercomputer invented.) Yes and No. If the developer released a certain amount of supply and the market price discovered and the developer BURNED extra coins in their wallet, then no it doesn't matter from any black and white point of view (only psychological.) The reason being that if the developer burned coins that practically were not already in circulation they did nothing to make the coin more valuable or scarce. But what if…

The whatiffactor

What if there was a burn, but that burn existed in a way that removed coins from the market that were ACTIVELY circulating? Muchwow, as oldsport would always say. So say that we want to remove coins from the ACTIVE market. The only practical way to do this is by buying them. In order to buy we need ...ETHER!

Yes and if there is no altruistic overlord donating ether, then we can take the ether from the fairest place. The fees.

Introducing, Spatial Computing ($CMPT)

CMPT is a blockchain native Spatial Computing system that uses smart contracts in a way that supports the ecosystem via an epoch system that actively buys back at market rate and burns the coins.

This is how it works:

The total Supply of CMPT has started at 1,000,000 Coins. All of these were added to Liquidity at fullish range UNIv3 ($28,000 to $280million market cap) After 280million MC, there will be no more coins to buy unless others provide liquidity. Being in a V3 pool, the buy/sell fee is 1%. This practically means that if there is a transaction for 100k USD, then $500 in ether and $500 in CMPT will be collected to the Fee Pool.

Typically, developers will just pocket these coins because “dev’ing” is hard, but that also limits the scope of the computing system to the involvement of the developer. We wanted to create something that outlives generations and is designed as an intelligent UP ONLY machine.

...The Up Only Machine

Spatial Computing has something called an Epoch. For the sake of this technology, an Epoch is approximately every 8 hours (as defined by Ethereum Blocks)

Every 8 hours, anybody (yes you can too) can call the contracts and the following happens:

1 - It pulls all of the Fees from the v3 pool (which has is locked into the Liquiditylock contract) This is a total of 1% of all the transaction volume

2 - It uses the Ether to market buy on the uniswap pool $CMPT which generates more volume and fees

3 - it sends the CMPT from the pool fees immediately to the burn address 0x00000 etc.. . and any WETH to the SpatialBurn contract

4 - SpatialBurn buys more CMPT and immediately sends it to the burn address..

5 - The caller of these contracts is entitled to % of the total fees claimed in WETH

Some special people have been lucky enough to call the contracts already and have shown us some nice images.

Lets break down what happens here.

claimAndCompute Fees are claimed from uni v3 1% pool and CMPT then leverages the big compute power to do swaps in the uni v3 pool, this generates additional volume and even more fees. After the CMPT is sent to the burnaddress. Any remaining WETH is then sent to the SpatialBurn contract for even more burns..

Example tx: https://eigenphi.io/mev/eigentx/multi/0xbeef59fe194c4080522643e1eef24bb0bc008d6802ace6e464da67983affb6f4

SpatialBurn WETH from the ClaimAndCompute is sent to this contract and used to buyback CMPT tokens on the market. MEV is incentivized and limited by TWAP and slippage to avoid front run.

Example tx: https://eigenphi.io/mev/eigentx/0xac1038b7e95863103baf1f4b8ea39a95d61f89bf8e51f32d6f8adee490366745

Easy right? Here is a epoch timer for your clicking…

So the more volume that is recorded, the more coins pulled from the active market and the more the price increases.

Here are a few simulations based on typical volume

Simulation 1: CMPT is trading for 14 days at an average of 1 million volume USD per day. The equates to $5,000 in Ether and $5000 In CMPT per day in burn. After 14 days, this would add up to $140,000 USD in CMPT being actively removed from the market. Consider that market cap floor.Now let's say that CMPT Catches on and instead of 14 days, we can weigh this over a 90-day period (the author assumes the volume would not be consistent, but rather average out) that would equate to $900,000 USD taken off the market.

Simulation 2:CMPT receives a large amount of attention such as recent things and records 40 million USD in volume in one day, for the next 7 days it averages at 10million USD in volume and then average 3 million USD for the next 30 days. This is a total of 200m USD in volume (as many coins do) and would equate to 2million dollars in coins taken off the market

Assuming CMPT interest continues what happens is that more it is traded, the more that supply gets scarce and removed and the price naturally goes up.

In fact since launch CMPT has already burned 2.56 Nvidia H100 GPUs or about $76,710 and on target for $3,990,000 this year

Let's look at an example like Shiba Inu, if it was originally designed with the CMPT technology.

In a 1,301 days of volume assessment of SHIBA there was $57.7bn according to coingeckos

That’s equal to average $1.33bn per month, $310m per week or $44.3m per day

If shiba had used cmpt tek, the 1% fees would have generated : Daily fees : $443k Weekly fees ; $3.1m Monthly fees : $3.3m Yearly fees ; $162m

Equivalent to over $577m buyback pressure on the token over 1,301 days

Interesting? I think so, Spatial Computing is designed to be ongoing and perpetual, meaning that it just goes and goes. Nobody can rug this (including me) and nobody can stop this.

Unleash the Computing.

Regards, MR. G

Official Contract Addresses:

CMPT Token: 0x3d000462Fb9826804a45c0EA869b83b69587F2dB

Liquidity Lock: 0xF163998A72F9788811E05667ebBDA87F276dd4D8

Compute: 0x2c4545D99A12D2d8F1eA901F1245DA0bFe8423d8

Spatial Burn: 0x710170D56468FbF82b0CA245ffbcC6469a795d6A

Community Links: