Rethinking DAO Governance with Separation of Powers and Trust Protocols
April 17th, 2025

This post explores a redesigned DAO governance model focused on trust, accountability, and people — born out of both personal frustration and public ambition.

🧩 *This essay is available as a free collectible NFT on Mirror.*If you find value in it, feel free to mint and keep a trace of this thinking. 💠

📌 Opening (Intro)

Web3 promised us freedom through decentralization — but too often delivered chaos without accountability.

So I asked: What if governance wasn’t just code — but care?

🛠️Designing Trust: Why I Wrote This

This wasn’t just a thought experiment — it was a personal challenge.How do we build systems where trust isn't an afterthought, but the foundation?Where users aren’t just passive voters, but active participants in shaping their digital environment?


😵 What Actually Happened

I was invited to interview for a Web3 product/PM role.And I thought:

“Finally! I’ll get to share my thoughts on DAO structures, trust design, and governance flow.”

I stayed up all night preparing.I built diagrams, mapped policy flows, and designed layered trust systems —all to express one message:

Structure is not just code. It’s a commitment.

But the interview?

It didn’t go how I imagined.


🙈 The Crash

Before I could say a word about "governance flow" or "community UX",I was hit with a barrage of tech stack questions:

“Have you used GA?”“Have you queried logs in Datadog?”“Can you explain your API monitoring setup?”

(To be honest, I’m not even sure those were the exact tools — but that was the vibe. 😅)

The more I tried to explain my governance model,the more my lack of engineering background showed.I froze.

In my rush to make the proposal polished,I had left gaps — and they showed.

The conversation slipped —from structure to syntax,from intent to interrogation.

I was dismissed before I could even finish.And that hurt — not because I was wrong for the role, but because I didn’t even get to share what I came to say.

(Technically, it wasn’t a formal rejection — but since there were no questions about salary expectations, it felt like the decision had already been made.)


💬 Why I’m Still Sharing This

Was part of it my fault?Absolutely.

Maybe what they really needed was a strong backend PM with infra experience.That’s fair.

I was just sad that I couldn’t share something I had poured so much thought into.

Because even if it’s not perfect,this work matters.

I’m not a blockchain engineer.I’m not a governance PhD.But I care — deeply — about how we build digital spaces together.

And I believe trust is something we should design on purpose.


🧩 What’s Inside the Proposal

🏛️ Separation of Powers DAO

Legislative (DAO) / Executive (Companies) / Judiciary (Auditors)

🌀 Trust Protocols

AI-assisted moderation, behavior + reputation scoring

🧠 Memory-Based UX

A user history interface that builds accountability — not confusion

💰 Sustainable Revenue Logic

Gas optimization + trust-based reward systems

📊 Modular Role Matrix

Complete with policy flow, abuse response, and appeals


📌 It’s not just a theory. It’s a structure.And it’s designed to evolve with you.

👉 This framework is an early design for turning trust into a measurable asset — and participation into a form of long-term value.

💼 This framework may also support:

  • Mission-driven startups building DAO-based platforms

  • For-profit organizations seeking trust-enhanced community systems

  • Web3 companies aiming to align their brand with ethical, participatory governance

  • Blockchain ventures pursuing ESG-aligned transparency strategies

👉 Whether you're building for public good or private innovation —this model offers a foundation for sustainable, trust-based systems.

💡 *Note: This model is still in its early design phase, and would require further technical discussion, testing, and iteration before full implementation.*But as an initial attempt to turn trust into a measurable asset and participation into long-term value, I hope it offers a meaningful starting point.


🔗 Read the full proposal:👉 Notion — Self-Reflections on Designing a Web3-Inspired Governance Model

👀 Bonus:You’ll find diagrams like these:

🗺️ Policy Flow

 A step-by-step flow of how a policy moves through proposal, review, DAO voting, appeal, and archival within the governance system.
A step-by-step flow of how a policy moves through proposal, review, DAO voting, appeal, and archival within the governance system.

🔁 Dual Trust Loop

A trust management cycle combining AI moderation and human-reviewed appeals, designed to balance efficiency with fairness.
A trust management cycle combining AI moderation and human-reviewed appeals, designed to balance efficiency with fairness.

🏛️ Urban Metaphor Mapping


🤝 Open for Feedback

If you’re a DAO builder, UX researcher, systems thinker, or just curious —Let’s talk.

This isn’t about me being right.It’s about building something better — together.

📬 catnaro16@gmail.com🔗 LinkedIn


P.S.

"Maybe I failed the interview. But this idea? It’s still here — and still growing."

And maybe the role truly called for someone with deeper technical chops. That’s fair.Still, I was just a little heartbroken that I couldn’t share the thing I put my heart into.

But maybe… this story doesn’t end with me.Maybe it’s yours to build further. 💡

I’m open to collaboration, feedback, pilot testing — or consulting on this model.

#DAO, #Governance, #Web3, #TrustProtocol, #Decentralization, #EthicalDesign

#Proposal, #Reflection, #ProductDesign, #SystemDesign

#OpenCollaboration, #CallForFeedback, #DAOthinking #AIinModeration, #TokenEconomy, #UXDesign, #ReputationSystems

Subscribe to Shenzi
Receive the latest updates directly to your inbox.
Mint this entry as an NFT to add it to your collection.
Verification
This entry has been permanently stored onchain and signed by its creator.
More from Shenzi

Skeleton

Skeleton

Skeleton