Summary

In 2024, the public blockchain real-world asset (RWA) sector experienced explosive growth, signaling the emergence of a new financial paradigm.  This report provides an in-depth analysis of the RWA market, highlighting how U.S. Treasuries and private credit are shaping a Two Pillars, Diversified Frontiers market structure.

Fueled by institutional adoption, technological breakthroughs, and regulatory clarity, RWA is rapidly transitioning from proof-of-concept to large-scale applications. Innovations like asset tokenization, cross-chain interoperability, and smart contract automation are reshaping finance. However, structural challenges—liquidity stratification, risk-return mismatches, and legal ambiguities over asset ownership—demand attention.

Looking ahead to 2025, three themes will dominate: asset-class innovation, technological evolution, and regulatory reconfiguration, injecting new momentum into RWA’s sustainable growth.

Ⅰ.  Market Overview: From Expansion to Structural Shifts

1.1 Explosive Growth & Diverging Trends

• Total on-chain RWA market size (excluding stablecoins): By the end of 2024, the market reached approximately $15.4 billion, representing an 80% year-over-year growth (compared to $8.6 billion in 2023).

• Diverging Growth Across Asset Categories:

  • U.S. Treasuries: 415% growth (from $769M → $3.96B)

  • Private Credit: 48% growth (from $6.66B → $9.83B)

  • Commodities and Other Assets: 32.6% growth (from $1.16B → $1.537B)

  • Real estate RWA is on the rise, with projections from leading analytical organizations as follows:

Key Insight: While the overall market experienced significant expansion, growth rates diverged sharply across asset classes: U.S. Treasuries achieved hypergrowth fueled by their safe-haven appeal and accelerating institutional adoption, while private credit and commodities mirrored market participants’ differentiated priorities around risk tolerance, yield generation, and liquidity preferences. Institutional optimism toward real estate tokenization—with projected ~20% CAGR—signals that digital transformation and improved asset liquidity efficiency will drive scalable adoption in this sector.

1.2 Market Structure Shifts

The 2024 RWA Market: Two Pillars, Diversified Frontiers

• Two-Pillar: U.S. Treasuries (415% YoY growth) and private credit (48% YoY growth) collectively dominate 85%+ of the market. Treasuries thrive on macroeconomic hedging and institutional adoption, while private credit attracts capital through yield-driven strategies.

• Diversified Frontiers: Traditional sectors like real estate and commodities sustain steady growth, while emerging niches—ESG assets, art securitization, and supply chain finance—accelerate diversification.

Underlying Drivers: This structural shift stems from the convergence of technological innovation, institutional capital inflows, and regulatory clarity. Three transformative trends—liquidity revaluation, scaled adoption, and asset diversification—define the market’s evolution.

Three Catalytic Trends: From Liquidity Reshaping to Ecosystem Maturity

• Liquidity Premium Compression: Blockchain Redefines Valuation

  • Technology Catalyst: 24/7 trading and smart contracts slash transaction costs by 30–90%, compressing liquidity premiums and boosting RWA valuations.

  • Virtuous Cycle: Enhanced liquidity → broader issuer/investor participation → further premium compression → market expansion.

• Institutional Scaling: Bridging TradFi and Web3

  • TradFi Adoption: BlackRock’s BUIDL fund and Franklin Templeton’s tokenized products validate RWA’s commercial viability.

  • Infrastructure Leap: Dedicated Layer 1 chains (Plume, Mantra) enable compliant tokenization frameworks.

  • Pricing Backbone: Chainlink’s decentralized oracles provide real-time pricing for 70%+ on-chain RWAs.

• Asset Diversification: Core Stability Meets Frontier Innovation

  • Core Anchors: Treasuries and credit retain dominance, yet growth divergence (415% vs. 48%) reflects risk-appetite stratification.

  • Boundary Expansion:

    • Digitizing Traditional Assets: Real estate (19–21% CAGR) and commodities gain liquidity via tokenization.

    • Emerging Categories: ESG assets, luxury goods, and IP tokenization unlock niche value, while supply chain finance (e.g., receivable tokenization) empowers SMEs.

Synergistic Impact: These trends—liquidity efficiency, institutional-grade infrastructure, and long-tail asset activation—collectively propel RWA’s mainstream penetration. Real estate tokenization epitomizes this convergence, emerging as a paradigm-shifting innovation.

Focal Frontier: Real Estate Tokenization’s Breakthrough

Despite its current niche scale, real estate tokenization demonstrates robust momentum, underpinning RWA’s diversification. Key insights:

• Growth Trajectory: According to ScienceSoft's optimistic projection, the global tokenized real estate market is expected to reach a staggering $3 trillion by 2030, accounting for 15% of real estate assets under management. While the market remains in its early stages in 2024, increasing adoption of tokenization technology by property sellers and growing investor demand validate the rationale for token issuance.

• Strategic Relevance: By integrating liquidity enhancement, institutional compliance, and multi-scenario applications, real estate tokenization exemplifies RWA’s transformative potential, solidifying its role as a pivotal segment within the broader RWA ecosystem.

Real Estate RWA Use Cases

II. Three Growth Engines Powering the Industry

2.1 Institutional Adoption

Institutions are not only embracing RWA as a new investment frontier but also leveraging public blockchains to optimize capital operations and enhance efficiency. Their entry accelerates market maturation, drives infrastructure development, and expands the digital boundaries of real-world assets.

Strategic Moves by Traditional Finance Titans

• BlackRock’s BUIDL Fund: Launched in March 2024 on Ethereum, BUIDL invests in cash, U.S. Treasuries, and repos, offering qualified investors USD-denominated yields. By July 2024, its AUM surpassed $500M, making it one of the largest tokenized Treasury funds.

• Global Expansion: Fidelity, JPMorgan, and Citi have also entered the RWA space, signaling institutional validation.

Standardization & Infrastructure Development

• Institutional participation is catalyzing market standardization and infrastructure upgrades:

• BlackRock’s Collaborations: Partnering with Securitize and Maple Finance, BUIDL ensures regulatory compliance for tokenized products, integrates on-chain credit markets, and enables real-time USDC liquidity pools for 1:1 redemptions.

• JPMorgan’s Onyx Platform: Tokenizes money market fund shares as collateral, enabling asset managers to transfer ownership via blockchain, thereby boosting capital efficiency.

2.2 Technical Breakthroughs

Compliance Innovations

To align blockchain with AML/KYC regulations, projects are embedding compliance directly into protocols:

• ERC-3643 Standard (Tokeny Solutions): Integrates identity management and transfer restrictions into token smart contracts. BlocHome, for instance, reduced compliance costs by 90% using this standard for tokenized real estate.

• Tether’s Hadron: Offers risk controls, asset issuance/burn mechanisms, and AML/KYC guidance.

• Circle’s Verite: An open-source identity framework enabling interoperable DeFi credentials while preserving user data control.

Cross-Chain Interoperability

Solutions addressing blockchain fragmentation:

• Wormhole’s NTT Framework: Enables native asset transfers across chains without wrapped tokens, eliminating intermediary risks.

• Chainlink’s CCIP: A universal cross-chain protocol connecting hundreds of networks, ensuring secure data and asset transfers.

RWA-Specific Layer 1 Chains

Plume Network: The Full-Stack RWAfi Pioneer

As the first Layer 1 blockchain purpose-built for real-world asset finance (RWAfi), Plume delivers a composable EVM-compatible environment optimized for rapid tokenization and global distribution of RWAs. Key features include:

• End-to-End Tokenization Engine: This simplifies asset onboarding with automated compliance checks, KYC/AML integration, and regulatory-ready templates.

• Interoperability Hub: Its SkyLink solution connects 16+ chains (e.g., Solana, Movement), enabling cross-chain RWA liquidity without wrapped tokens.

• Ecosystem Traction: Over 180 protocols are live on Plume, spanning tokenized real estate, private credit, and commodities. A strategic partnership with RWA.xyz ensures comprehensive analytics for on-chain RWAs.

Mantra: Compliance-First Infrastructure for Institutional RWA

Mantra offers a permissionless, high-performance, and scalable Web3 development environment tailored for regulated RWA applications:

• Regulatory Alignment: Mantra is the first platform to receive a DeFi VASP license from VARA, enabling it to legally operate a virtual asset exchange, brokerage, asset management, and investment services in Dubai, reinforcing DeFi’s legitimacy within a regulated framework.

• Real-World Impact: Partnered with DAMAC Group to tokenize $1B worth of Dubai real estate, enhancing liquidity for high-value properties.

• Developer-Centric: Provides SDKs and APIs for seamless integration of identity verification, asset custody, and cross-chain settlement.

The 2024 RWA Tech Stack – A Three-Layer Decoupling

The tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) in 2024 achieved a three-layer decoupling—asset, protocol, and application layers—enabling modular innovation while ensuring interoperability:

• Asset Layer:

  • ERC-3643 Standard: Widely adopted for compliant equity tokenization, embedding identity verification, transfer restrictions, and automated KYC/AML checks directly into smart contracts. This slashes compliance costs by up to 90% (e.g., BlocHome’s real estate tokenization).

• Protocol Layer:

  • Chainlink Oracles: Expanded coverage of RWA price feeds, ensuring reliable on-chain valuation.

  • Cross-Chain Interoperability (CCIP): Enabled seamless RWA management across blockchains, resolving fragmentation and boosting liquidity.

• Application Layer:

  • Lending: Maple Finance pioneered uncollateralized institutional loans, later extending access to retail users via Syrup.fi (launched June 2024). Defactor has also emerged as a key player, offering comprehensive on-chain lending solutions tailored for RWA and facing retail users.

  • SME Financing: Centrifuge tokenized real-world receivables and invoices, unlocking blockchain-based liquidity for small businesses.

  • Liquidity via AMM: IX Swap has advanced automated market-making (AMM) technology, facilitating enhanced liquidity for tokenized assets.

  • Secondary Market Trading: Polytrade is driving the development of secondary markets, enabling efficient trading of tokenized RWAs.

Synergy in Action: This decoupled architecture allows each layer to evolve independently while maintaining seamless integration—accelerating RWA adoption from niche experimentation to scalable, institutional-grade solutions.

2.3 Regulatory Dynamics

RWA’s global growth hinges on balanced regulatory frameworks that protect investors while fostering innovation.

Divergence & Convergence in Global Regulation

• U.S. SEC: Clarified securities rules for tokenized assets, mandating compliance with existing laws. RWA projects (e.g., RWA Inc.) now partner with compliance firms for securities classification.

• EU’s MiCA: Expanded RWA guidelines, categorizing stablecoins as:

  • Asset-Referenced Tokens (ARTs): Pegged to multiple assets; issuers face stringent capital/reserve requirements.

  • Electronic Money Tokens (EMTs): Pegged to a single fiat; issuers require e-money licenses.

• Asia’s Sandboxes:

  • Japan: Recognizes stablecoins as “electronic payment instruments” under revised Payment Services Act.

  • Hong Kong & Singapore: Launched regulatory sandboxes for digital assets like RWA.

Balancing Innovation & Oversight

• Regulatory Sandboxes: Allow controlled testing of new models (e.g., HKMA’s sandbox for stablecoins).

• Cross-Border Coordination: Efforts under FATF and G20 aim to harmonize standards, mitigating jurisdictional conflicts.

III. Market Paradoxes: Structural Contradictions Amid Growth

3.1 Liquidity Stratification

One of the core promises of RWA tokenization is to enhance liquidity—allowing assets to be traded more efficiently and transparently through blockchain technology. However, in practice, different types of tokenized assets exhibit vastly different levels of liquidity, creating a stratified market.

• Differences in Asset Nature and Market Scale

  • Intrinsic Asset Characteristics. Tokenized U.S. Treasuries benefit from government backing, mature secondary markets, and strong credit ratings, making them highly liquid with active trading and efficient price discovery.

  • Real estate and art-based RWAs, however, suffer from lower liquidity due to complex valuation, niche investor demand, and restrictive trading mechanisms. These assets tend to have higher holding costs and longer exit periods, making them less liquid.

  • Market Depth and Investor Structure. Highly liquid assets attract both institutional and retail investors, leading to deep order books and tight bid-ask spreads, allowing for quick trade execution at any given time.

  • Low-liquidity assets, on the other hand, face fragmented markets, where fewer buyers and sellers result in thin trading volumes, price volatility, and difficulty in executing large transactions without significant slippage.

• Investor Behavior and Market Expectations

  • Preference for High-Liquidity Assets. Investors naturally favor assets that are easily tradable and have low transaction costs, especially in bullish market conditions. This reinforces a cycle where liquid assets continue attracting more participants, while illiquid assets risk being marginalized, creating a “survival of the fittest” effect in the market.

  • Liquidity Premium and Price Volatility. More liquid assets tend to carry a premium—investors are willing to accept lower yields in exchange for higher tradability. Less liquid assets face significant discounts, particularly during periods of financial stress when investors rush to exit positions. This exacerbates price swings and amplifies market risks.

Strategies to Improve Liquidity

To address these challenges, many RWA projects are implementing the following liquidity-enhancing mechanisms:

• Market-Making Activities: Encourage market makers to provide continuous buy and sell quotes, reducing spreads and improving trading activity.

• Integration with DeFi Protocols: Enable RWAs to be used as collateral in lending markets or traded as pairs on decentralized exchanges (DEXs).

  • Example: Tokenized real estate on RealtyX can be staked in DeFi platforms to generate yield and increase utility and liquidity.

Trading Incentives: Airdrops, trading competitions, and yield farming incentives can encourage investors to actively trade and hold lower-liquidity RWAs.

3.2 Balancing Risk and Return in RWAs

While RWAs offer innovative opportunities for yield generation, their risk-return profiles may require careful evaluation to align investor expectations with market realities. Key considerations include:

Evolving Transparency Standards

Traditional financial markets benefit from established frameworks for risk disclosure and regular audits. Many RWA platforms, however, are still developing standardized practices for risk reporting. This can create challenges for investors, such as:

• Difficulty in fully assessing the credit profiles of tokenized assets.

• Limited visibility into collateral quality or valuation methodologies, which may affect pricing consistency.

Structural Complexities in Asset-BackingTokenized RWAs often rely on intermediaries like SPVs or custodians to manage legal ownership. While these structures are common in traditional finance, their nascent integration with blockchain technology introduces questions about:

• The clarity of tokenholders’ legal recourse in edge-case scenarios (e.g., custodian insolvency).

• Potential gaps between theoretical asset-backing and practical enforceability.

Risk Communication and Market DynamicsSome high-yield RWA products may not yet adequately contextualize risks like default probability or credit concentration, which could lead to mismatched investor expectations. Additionally, while traditional markets use tools like CDS to hedge risk, the RWA ecosystem is still maturing in this area. DeFi’s sentiment-driven nature also amplifies volatility:

• Bullish phases may temporarily inflate valuations beyond underlying fundamentals.

• Shifts in sentiment could amplify price corrections, particularly in less liquid markets.

Opportunities for GrowthThese challenges highlight areas where the RWA sector could adopt lessons from traditional finance, such as**:**

1. Standardize Risk Assessment Models: Develop on-chain credit scoring frameworks to rate tokenized assets.

2. Introduce Insurance Mechanisms for RWAs: Insurance-backed tokenization can help de-risk investments and enhance investor confidence.

3. Improve Transparency Through Decentralized Rating Agencies: On-chain rating solutions can provide real-time credit assessments for tokenized RWAs.

3.3 The Legal Paradox of Asset Control in RWA Tokenization

The tokenization of real-world assets (RWAs) creates a misalignment between blockchain-based ownership systems and traditional legal frameworks, exposing token holders to a convergence of legal uncertainties. These challenges fall into three interconnected categories:

1. Ownership Ambiguity: Divergence Between On-Chain and Off-Chain Rights

Focus: Technical vs. legal definitions of ownership.

• Blockchain’s Promise: Decentralized ledgers ensure cryptographic proof of token uniqueness and transferability.

• Legal Reality: Ownership in traditional systems (e.g., property registries, corporate equity) requires formal recognition outside blockchain.

  • Example: Tokenized real estate may lack enforceable ownership rights unless recorded in a government land registry.

• Smart Contracts vs. Judicial Authority:

  • Automated execution (e.g., dividend distributions) may conflict with court orders (e.g., asset freezes), risking retroactive invalidation of on-chain actions.

2. Bankruptcy Risks: Weak Isolation of Tokenized Assets

Focus: Risks when intermediaries or asset custodians fail.

Tokenized RWAs often use SPVs/trusts to shield assets from intermediary risks. While these structures aim to protect holders, their effectiveness hinges on legal design:

• Intent vs. Reality: SPVs isolate assets, but untested scenarios (e.g., mismanagement) could challenge tokenholder claims.

• Legal Ambiguity: Some courts may classify tokens as unsecured claims, affecting recovery if intermediaries fail.

  • Example: SPV creditors might prioritize claims over tokenized assets in bankruptcy.

3. Cross-Border Jurisdictional Gaps

Focus: Conflicts arising from multi-jurisdictional operations.

• Fragmented Legal Recognition:

  • Jurisdictions vary in how they classify tokenized assets: some recognize them as property rights, others as contractual claims.

• Enforcement Challenges:

  • Case Study: A tokenized gold vaulted in Jurisdiction A may face conflicting ownership rulings if Jurisdiction B disputes custody rights.

• Immutability vs. Legal Orders:

  • Blockchain’s irreversible transactions clash with court-mandated freezes or seizures, creating enforcement deadlocks.

Key Implications and Paths Forward

• Regulatory Arbitrage: Projects often structure entities in “crypto-friendly” jurisdictions to sidestep stricter regimes, amplifying systemic risks.

• Hybrid Solutions:

  • Legal wrappers (e.g., tokenized SPVs) and standardized smart contracts aim to bridge on-chain/off-chain governance gaps.

• Call for Harmonization: Global standards are needed to align blockchain’s efficiency with legal safeguards for investor protection.

IV. Future Projections: Three Major Trends in RWA by 2025

4.1 Revolution in Asset Categories

The Rise of Off-Chain Assets on the Blockchain: As the RWA market continues to grow, private credit and U.S. Treasury bonds, with their superior liquidity and credit ratings, are expected to maintain dominance. However, less-standardized assets, particularly real estate in developed or high-growth economic regions, are anticipated to undergo significant tokenization by 2025.

According to Bitwise’s forecast, by the end of 2025, the RWA market is expected to reach $50 billion, of which the Security Token Market predicts that tokenized real estate will total $1.4 trillion, while Roland Berger forecasts real estate to account for nearly one-third of the market share.

Roland Berger’s projections suggest that by 2030, real estate will become the largest category of tokenized assets, holding close to a third of the market. This growth is largely driven by the maturation of blockchain technology and the increasing demand for RWAs, which traditionally have lower liquidity. Tokenization enables more efficient trading and management of these assets.

RWAfi Large-Scale Integration and Innovation: Before RWA enters the Web3 era, its development was mainly driven by the desire for traditional financial liquidity. However, with RWA tokenization, this process is not just about asset digitization but also deep integration with decentralized finance (DeFi) and other blockchain-based financial systems. This integration has given rise to a powerful “RWA + any ‘Fi’” model, fueling financial innovation across various sectors. Real estate tokenization combined with DeFi is a key aspect of this RWAfi fusion innovation. By tokenizing real world assets and integrating them with DeFi protocols, the following innovative applications can be achieved:

• Collateralized Loans: Tokenized RWAs can be pledged as collateral to borrow funds from DeFi lending platforms (e.g., using a tokenized apartment as collateral for a stablecoin loan).

• Yield Farming: Token holders deposit RWA tokens into DeFi protocols to earn interest (e.g., from loan repayments) or protocol rewards (e.g., governance tokens). Unlike passive holding, yield farming actively leverages assets to generate compounded returns.

• Liquidity Mining: Users provide liquidity for RWA token trading pairs in decentralized exchanges (DEXs), earning trading fees and liquidity incentives proportional to their stake.

Example: RealtyX, Plume Network, and Ecosystem Partners

RealtyX (real estate tokenization platform) and Plume Network (L1 blockchain for RWAs) are pioneering an innovative framework for RWAfi:

1. Tokenization: RealtyX tokenizes properties (e.g., residential properties in Dubai) via Plume’s blockchain, ensuring regulatory adherence and interoperability.

2. Collateralized Loans: Token holders use RealtyX assets as collateral to borrow on Plume-integrated lending platforms like Defactor or Mystic Finance.

3. Yield Farming: By combining RealtyX’s tokenized real estate with Pendle’s yield tokenization, users can create tradable tokens representing future rental income for optimized returns.

4. Liquidity Mining: RealtyX tokens are pooled with stablecoins on DEXs like Rooster Protocol, incentivizing liquidity providers with both projects’ native tokens.

4.2 Technological Paradigm Shift

Adoption of Zero-Knowledge Proof Technology (ZKP): Zero-knowledge proof (ZKP) technology has shown immense potential in multiple Web3 fields. In the RWA sector, the use of ZKPs can validate and facilitate transactions while ensuring data privacy. This is especially crucial for assets involving sensitive information. Conduct KYC/AML checks via ZKPs, allowing institutions to validate credentials (e.g., accredited investor status) without accessing raw personal data.

Adoption of Modular Blockchains: Modular blockchain architecture has already demonstrated its advantages in enhancing network performance and scalability across other Web3 sectors. In the RWA field, modular blockchains enable flexible combinations of different functional modules to meet the diverse needs of asset tokenization. This will facilitate the standardization and interoperability of RWAs, lowering the technical barriers and costs associated with tokenizing assets. For example, the Plume network has attracted over 180 RWA-related protocols, over 300 million user addresses, and generated billions of transactions during its testnet phase.

4.3 Restructuring of Regulatory Frameworks

Shifts in U.S. Regulatory Policies: Given the Trump administration’s favorable stance toward cryptocurrencies and the increasing involvement of U.S. institutions in the RWA sector, it is expected that the U.S. will adopt a more open regulatory stance toward crypto assets. Policies and regulations supporting RWA tokenization are likely to be enacted, promoting financial innovation while ensuring market stability and security. This will provide a clearer legal framework for the development of RWAs, reducing compliance risks and attracting more institutional and investor participation.

Cross-border Unified Regulations: Although not a primary trend in 2025, as RWAs continue to grow, especially with the rise of non-standard assets, cross-border legal disputes related to RWAs, particularly non-standard assets, may increase. This will likely prompt regulators from different countries to consider creating a unified international regulatory framework to address legal and compliance challenges related to cross-border transactions.

Conclusion: Navigating RWA’s Growing Pains Toward Institutional Maturity

2024 marks RWA tokenization’s shift from conceptual promise to scalable reality, driven by surging institutional adoption (e.g., BlackRock’s BUIDL), regulatory milestones, and infrastructure breakthroughs like Plume Network’s RWA-optimized L1. Yet, as tokenized Treasuries, real estate, and private credit gain traction, the sector must confront inherent tensions:

Systemic Challenges

1. The Centralization Dilemma:

   • Many RWA protocols rely on “permissioned DeFi” models (e.g., custodians, SPVs) to comply with regulations, creating friction with blockchain’s decentralized ethos.

   • Legal ownership remains tethered to traditional frameworks, limiting smart contracts’ autonomy in disputes.

2. Democratization Gaps:

   • Lowered investment minimums clash with persistent barriers: KYC/AML complexity, opaque risk disclosures, and technical literacy divides.

   • DAO governance—though promising—struggles with low participation and regulatory ambiguity.

3. Market Fragmentation:

   • Liquidity clusters around blue-chip RWAs (e.g., U.S. Treasuries), sidelining niche assets.

   • Cross-border legal ambiguities threaten enforceable ownership claims.

The Path Forward: Collaboration Over Compromise

To realize RWAs’ borderless potential, stakeholders must prioritize:

• Frictionless Interoperability

  • Bridging legacy finance and blockchain via frameworks like Plume’s RWA-specific Layer 1 and RealtyX’s DeFi integrations.

• Regulation-by-Design

  • Embed KYC/AML into protocols (e.g., ZK-powered credentials) while preserving privacy—proving compliance need not stifle innovation.

• Global Governance

  • Coalitions Partner with bodies like FATF and BIS to harmonize cross-border standards, ensuring tokenized rights survive bankruptcy courts and jurisdictional clashes.

• Democratization Through Education

  • Simplify access via intuitive interfaces (e.g., RealtyX’s retail-friendly dapp) and amplify transparency through tools like Chainlink’s asset-grade oracles.

A Blueprint for Responsible Scale

RWAs will redefine finance not by mirroring old systems, but by rewiring trust:

• For institutions: 24/7 liquidity for once-illiquid balance sheets.

• For individuals: Global access to markets like Dubai real estate or Singaporean private credit.

• For builders: Projects like RealtyX are proving that hybrid frameworks can balance decentralization with real-world pragmatism.

The infrastructure is live. The momentum is irreversible. Now, the industry must execute—with rigor, inclusivity, and eyes firmly on the horizon.

Learn more about RealtyX

• RealtyX Website

• Twitter

• Discord

• Telegram

• DeBox