A look into the reasoning behind the explosive growth of decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) while highlighting challenges and opportunities associated with building a DAO ecosystem for the long-term.
But first…
On January 24, 1848, James Wilson Marshall, a carpenter from New Jersey, found flakes of gold floating in the American River at the base of the Sierra Nevada Mountains near Coloma, California. He wasn’t looking for gold: Marshall was there on business building a water-powered sawmill for John Sutter, the German-born Swiss immigrant who founded the colony that eventually became the city of Sacramento.
Marshall later described his prolific discovery, “It made my heart thump, for I was certain it was gold.”
Marshall and Sutter tried to keep the gold a secret, but to no avail. By mid-June nearly three-quarters of the male population in San Francisco had left for the gold mines. Throughout 1849, would-be miners traveled across the United States pursuing opportunity and wealth they thought they would never see. By the end of 1849, California’s population had jumped 4x year over year to an estimated 100,000.
Unfortunately, basic infrastructure could not be developed in time to match the population growth of the area - overcrowded mining camps spewed chaos, banditry, violence and more. The region was largely undeveloped resulting in little to no infrastructure to feed, clothe, and house the miners. Creative entrepreneurs found band-aid solutions to address infrastructure issues - such as importing small prefabricated housing from China.
Which brings us to...
We’ve seen an explosion in the creation of DAOs over the last 18-24 months similar to that of the gold rush in the mid-1800’s. And like the hopeful miners who traveled thousands of miles in search of opportunity, crypto/web3/DAO builders and enthusiasts believe a better world awaits.
In my opinion there are four major reasons for this DAO boom:
Given the novelty of decentralized internet-native organizations, many DAO founders and operators are ill-equipped for the long-run. The hypergrowth of the DAO population boom has left little time for foundational DAO tooling and best practices to develop and mature. This sentiment is best portrayed by Julia Rosenberg’s tweet:
Fortunately, this has not resulted in the banditry and violence faced in the gold rush. It’s primarily resulted in confused and overwhelmed DAO contributors and operators left to deal with some level of pain as the ecosystem learns and matures together.
To expand, I believe DAO founders and early DAO contributors have a lot to balance when thinking about how to attain their long-term goals:
Achieving product-market fit seems to be the most straight forward part to the DAO equation, given current maturity of general product management. There are best practices outlining how to iterate, test and learn to find product-market fit for products, services, communities, open-source software, etc. Not every DAO will achieve product-market fit, but at least there’s precedent and a playbook that can be referred to.
The biggest challenges for DAO core teams involve the oscillation between:
Even with a blossoming DAO tooling landscape supporting core functional areas of DAO operations, many of these solutions do not provide the composability needed to incrementally build towards progressive decentralization.
Core decentralization themes such as core team involvement, asset management, community participation and token distribution need to be modularly weaved into the fabric of DAO tools to support core functional areas and DAO decentralization goals.
The most successful and widely adopted DAO tools of the future will support DAOs on their journey to decentralization through frictionless and intuitive experiences.
The explosion of the DAO ecosystem has shown us that the collective passion and energy is there. The promise of flexibility, autonomy, ownership and more has given DAO founders and contributors all the motivation to continue building their products and communities to realize their goals.
However, the collective community should also acknowledge that the tooling and related infrastructure needed to allow DAOs to scale and move without friction towards decentralization is not there. Without addressing these issues DAO core teams, contributors and communities will continue to feel frustrated, lost and overwhelmed when attempting to push their products, services and protocols forward. It’s up to the community to continue to productively and publicly discuss, debate and push for better solutions that serve unmet needs of core DAO operations and decentralization objectives.
Thanks to the folks who provided major influence and inspiration for this piece and continue to shape my thoughts every day: Nichanan Kesonpat, Jesse Walden, Chase Chapman, Samer Hassan, Jacob Phillips, Julia Rosenberg, Amphiboly, Christian.
If anyone is interested in discussing more about the future of DAOs please reach out on Twitter (@itsdanwu).