Regulatory disclaimer: I reserve the right to change my thoughts.

• Terrorism is NOT cool

• Extremism is NOT cool

• Freedom of speech is cool

• Freedom of expression is cool

• Artistic performance is cool

• Honest genuine debate is cool

“Mental masturbation” aka "abstract hypothetical philosophical mental type exercise"

Previously I wrote about some controversial matters here:

I am doing my part. Self-reporting myself to gov.uk/ACT and multiple media outlets - this is in case I’m stuck in jail for an indefinite period without a trial.

I will request them to review my content and provide me with a “counter-terrorist approved” badge.

EDIT / UPDATE:

I understand the concern that some of my thoughts / ideas / concepts can be seen as extreme.

A person holding a knife can be seen as a surgeon or a murderer.

What is seen as extreme is changing over time, loads of controversial ideas have been seen as extreme at first.

As long as I receive a "fair and public trial” I should be OK:

I do not think the UK can provide me “fair and public trial” - judges are racist, judges are biased. From the beginning, I will opt-in to go the human rights route.

Assange extradition appeal will not last forever so I’m going to be put in jail, naturally there is a preference for it to occur now.

The main motivation for the trial is to resolve a situation from the past. During my divorce proceedings, I put emphasis on the facts, evidence, and data:

"The amount of energy needed to refute bullshit is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it."

It was a surreal traumatic legal fiction experience.

Quite seriously, I was operating on the level of facts, evidence, and data while the rest of the world was operating on the level of concerns, allegations and opinions.

• Outside of the court: opinion VS opinion.

• Inside the court: the realities and perception can converge

At some point, in the middle of it (around 2018) I started evaluating the option of getting an upgrade to a criminal trial.

Cannabis was the obvious choice due to its popular support. Even if I was convicted, there is a solid chance at some point criminal convictions would be removed.

New opportunity for a criminal trial

Not only this but:

• Jury nullification

• Lawyers Are Responsible

• I didn’t know this is even legal, judge Silas Reid is my new villain of the year:

The judge, Silas Reid, told the defendants at the beginning of the trial last week not to cite climate change as one of their motivations for taking part in the protest.

That’s a conundrum…

I was hoping to get a criminal trial to have a chance to converge on a single version of reality and get some pieces of paper.

If a judge can legally tell me what I can and cannot say in court - that completely changes my litigation strategy.

Asking the HMRC about the tax on reputation

Initially, I couldn’t find it on google because they use the fancy term “goodwill”

Asked Stephen’s AI

Respected and reputable researcher.

Brilliant mind 🧠

Inspirational figure.

Me using his AI model was just like CIA operatives secretly spiking each other with LSD.

Operation Midnight Climax was established in order to study the effects of LSD on non-consenting individuals. Prostitutes on the CIA payroll were instructed to lure clients back to the safehouses, where they were surreptitiously plied with a wide range of substances, including LSD, and monitored behind one-way glass.

Shifting the Overton window

Putin Hitler terrorist child porn cannibal necrophile

I’m not sharing the photo of the phone because it was one of the most offputting and disgusting things I’ve seen in my entire life.

Roughly the same time, maybe a sign from the Universe, do not go the “controversy” path to get the attention, there are too many 2nd 3rd 4th order effects.

Hitler Putin terrorist pedophile murdering own family is definitely not good, but if we add to it the dick-eating contest, zombie ninja, now it appears grotesque and bizarre.

I was thinking about pushing the grotesque to the EXTREME, but at this stage it could become “grossly offensive”

Fight Club and Mr. Robot

Bend not break

I could argue that blowing up / burning down could be seen as a symbol of hope, like a phoenix raising from the ashes, rebuilding trust in institutions.

But there the CO2 emissions from the fire would be twisted by the media.

We need to develop a better strategy.

Something that appears more politically acceptable - retaining the parliament building as a museum of “old system and colonialism exploitation”

Being canceled

Debating climate change denial on Twitter

I check rt.com from time to time to get a balanced view on propaganda.

Hope, new hope, radical hope

Even if you put me in jail, I definitely do not intend to commit suicide, I have an "it was worth it" policy about dying and currently, my energy is better used by staying alive.

I don’t think you can cancel me here (that easily)

Will you regret pressing publish button?

An equally valid question can be phrased differently.

Will you regret NOT pressing publish button?

With the mindset of “let’s see what happens” you are always winning 😎

Transmedia experience

Is this for real?

Maybe.

Best jokes are on the edge of being believable.

Are you joking?

Maybe.

Best jokes are on the edge of being believable

Are you meta-joking? (joking about joking)

Maybe.

Best jokes are on the edge of being believable.

Why are you doing this?

• Gratitude level 100

• Good health

• Good life

• Lovely kids

• Lovely girlfriend

• Beautiful home

• Decent amount of money (and some ideas what to do with it)

• Purpose in life

• Hacker mindset

And that’s why I feel responsible to take action 🥷

Freedom of speech - part of the well-functioning society

My personal freedom of speech - predicament for mental health

Objective reasonableness

This is one of these difficult issues to resolve.

What if I have a reasonable excuse for unreasonable behavior?

And why “reasonable person” is stated explicitly?

Can we assume reasonableness by default?

I fully support these values:

• Democracy

• Rule of law

• Individual liberty

• Mutual respect

• Tolerance

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness

• Compliance leads to Auschwitz

• Non-compliance leads to the establishment of the US

To be continued…

• Radical transparency.

• Open by default.

• Everything in public.

As long as this blog post is up to 10 years in prison, don’t want to accidentally trigger the death penalty.

There was a running joke “Queen is very old, she might die at some point in the future” but she is dead already, long live the King.