Purpose of this post: Checkpoint. Snapshot.

Here we are.

Now.

Previously:

• Photo of the whiteboard: December 2020

• Summary of my work: August 2020

• So what to you do? April 2022

Back in the day created a portable embassy of Liberland to ensure freedom of my thoughts:

I still operate under these principles - freeom of thought, freedom of speech.

Through the Ministry of Truth, the Party engages in omnipresent government surveillance, historical negationism, and constant propaganda to persecute individuality and independent thinking.

My situation is not simple.

But I like my problems.

Interesting people have interesting problems.

I genuinely would like to simplify. Close. Resolve. Move on.

So let’s do it.

I would like to fully express my thoughts and present various precautions, disclaimers, safety measures…

REGULATORY DISCLAIMER: Generated by AI. Standup comedy. Genuine satire.

The best jokes are on the edge of being believable… We had a Netflix show “Squid Game” and Mr Beast created a timely video:

129M subscribers. 345M views.

Baby shark has 12B views, more than humans on this planet:

Now imagine a TV show co-produced co-syndicated with Netflix, YouTube, Spotify, Apple, Amazon, HBO, Disney, and every single media platform out there.

Add some mystery to it, a “real fiction”, the audience does not know if it is for real…

And then 🪄 🎩 🔮 big reveal, turning it into live streaming.

You do not know if this post is for real

What is legal or illegal is a matter of evolving consensus.

In my jurisdiction no thoughts are illegal. That’s why the opening statement: “portable embassy of Liberland to ensure freedom of my thoughts”

I have a collection of law-related domains:

• LegalScreenshot.com

• LegalPrintscreen.com

• IndependentTribunal.com

• IndependentTribunal.org

I’ve also created A.R.S.E. because who is watching the watchers, who is regulating regulators?

Dealing with legal fiction became part of my identity.

At this point in time, going to court and getting a decision would be beneficial to me:

prevents an accused person from being tried again on the same (or similar) charges following an acquittal or conviction

In other words, to go to court, would be the wrap-up, one way or another.

That’s why engaging with CPS - Crown Prosecution Service.

Before engaging with CPS I was rejected by 3 lawyers, one of them doing it illegally:

Trying to find out who does the best private prosecutions and then trying to prosecute myself (and plead not guilty) obviously:

I’ve tried the intellectual property angle too:

I guess that if I had more money, there would be a legal team who would agree to take on my case.

I was also thinking of persistent willful gross negligence and taking court to court and various aspects of systematic racism.

Not this type of racism:

(noone raises the question what were she / he / them / they wearing on that day)

This type of racism:

Some people got frustrated

Translate: “podpalil sie przed sądem” → "He set himself on fire in court"

I guess local media covered the initial case that inspired the next one. That's why in Sweden they have policy of not reporting on the terrorist attacks.

After last month's trio of attacks in Stockholm, public broadcaster SVT was accused of a leftist cover-up for leaving the story out of a main evening news programme.

(it’s about inspiring for copycat incidents)

I was thinking about setting myself on fire but that wouldn’t make much difference.

When contemplating my own death, I would like to say after the fact “it was worth it”.

Terrorism

Google “xr terrorist organization”

Unrelated to XR but reated to terrorism: "leeds man charged with terror offences"

Same article syndicated everywhere:

RIPA 2000

Terrorism is a reliable strategy to reduce civil liberties:

Critics claim that the spectres of terrorism, internet crime and paedophilia were used to push the act through and that there was little substantive debate in the House of Commons. The act has numerous critics, many of whom regard the RIPA regulations as excessive and a threat to civil liberties in the UK.

Paedophilia works too.

It made me think what is the term for one other thing… Apparently it does not exist yet.

Back in the day I had interesting debate about clothing and how it affects rape.

• Question on Quora: Do the clothes a victim wears (e.g. revealing or sexually charged clothing) make them more likely to be raped?

• Quesiton on StackOverflow: Is a woman who dresses sexually suggestively more likely to get raped?

I enjoyed digging into this scientific paper:

Would be cool to make it illegal as it doesn’t fit mainstream agenda.

Freedom of speech?

Assuming that I’m already committing a crime, I’d much rather use the terrorist legislation, at least I will get a free ticket o Guantanamo.

Marsita, the goddess of mischief

Stepping up my game…

BUT

I can also opt out.

Opting out sounds like freedom.

OPT OUT

That’s why E-Estonia (since 2015)

That’s why Bitnation

That’s why Liberland

That’s why Nation3

That’s why Network State Genesis

I’m still partially embedded in the old system.

Getting a criminal conviction could interfere with my career.

Going to court could be beneficial.

Consent order would be even better.

I’m not sure to what extent either of this options is possible / attainable.

I’m still evaluating various legal strategies:

Assuming that I’m already committing a crime, I’d much rather use the terrorist legislation, at least I will get a free ticket o Guantanamo.

I guess that if you are in the UK jurisdiction this might be “grossly offensive”:

British Royal Family were doing Nazi salutes to a video that seemed very immediately to us to be a matter of great cultural historical and general interest.

Closing thoughts

Testing features.

0.01 ETH collectible entry 💰💰💰

Pick it up if you resonate with these thoughts…