Bitcoin may be the decentralized incentive for transnational co-development of clean energy at scale. However, it continues to run on the foundations under question. The following are selected big questions forming the need for Open Electricity DAO.

Does the current energy distribution paradigm make sense if we retrace it from the concepts to the electron source, down the supply chain and into household use?

Is the physics and mathematics of electricity rigorous along its discovery chain?

What were the forks in knowledge and technological development along the way?
Do previous decisions continue to be the best possible solutions?

Does the current economic model for electricity prioritize the sustainability of life on the planet?

How are the following statements relevant to Open Electricity DAO?
An absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
An absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

Physicist David Deutch, father of quantum computing stated that anything which is not prohibited by laws of nature, is possible. It remains a matter of “how”.

If it is possible that all points in time and space are connected and that the mind is non-local, then what difference does this make?

Who dares to revisit C.W. Maxwell’s Open Asymmetrical System equations from the „The Dynamical Theory of the Electromagnetic Field” in an audit using advanced distributed ledger technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs on a live hashgraph?