• Expression of the Earth Changes

• ZISE

• First published Aug 16, 2024

We know that they do, but it seems paradoxical. Neoliberalism is liberal-capitalism, and Islam isn’t woke.

But they all seem to be in on an agenda to destroy Western civilisation. And if you are concerned about this at all, then you are a “far right thug”.

I’ve realised that actually, you are simply a nationalist, which - according to them - is just as bad.

Neoliberalism despises nationalism, because it likes globalism, free trade, and open borders.

Marxism despises nationalism, because it wants international communism and equality of outcome.

Islam despises non-Islamic nationalism in Western nations, because it threatens its desire to spread into those nations and become dominant.

Each of these ideologies, although very different from each other, and seemingly incongruent, seem to have formed an Unholy Alliance to take down the Occident.

As we observe, they despise our flags; 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧, preferring these ones; 🇵🇸🏳️‍🌈.

You could argue that belief in the fundamental integrity and strength of a nation to uphold its cultural norms is inherently fascist. And if that is so, then so be it; liberalism and democracy should then be deployed in the right doses to counterbalance a nations fascistic tendencies, to make sure that it doesn’t get too nationalistic, authoritarian, and so forth.

The free nation should support and protect the rights of the individual, and it should support the societal, economic, and cultural contribution and integration of all of its citizens, including its ethnic and religious minorities, its queers, and its cultural outliers, without allowing their ideologies and their demands to dominate, compromise, or overreach the cultural norms, the traditional frameworks, and the integrity of the nation.

This would create a social democracy. Something like what The Social Democratic Party (SDP) in the UK might represent.

Essentially, it’s well balanced and well rounded radical centrism.

In a free nation, you should have some liberalism; healthy levels of free trade and privatisation, healthy levels of immigration, and you should have secure borders.

You should aim to organically cultivate a strong sense of national identity, which should arise naturally, because citizens feel valued as part of their nation and its established culture and environment, whilst cautiously, and democratically evolving the nations identity through culture, technology and innovation.

You aim to look after, and to integrate your minorities, but you - humanely - keep their numbers down because oversaturated multiculturalism starts to cause problems, as we observe now, in our current crisis.

In the Unholy Alliance problems are not solved, they are only dressed up for the occasion until they start to decay from within.

In fact, minorities are often exploited to serve the window dressing of the regime, when in reality they couldn’t give a toss.

An example is a black lady used to promote the army, when the reality is that she’s racially abused on the inside.

The solution to situations such as this is not more DEI, CRT, advertising, and cultural Marxism. It’s society evolving towards a higher state of compassion in consciousness, where people are valued and respected for their qualities and their attributes beyond skin colour, cultural-ethnic background, or whatever-orientation they might have.

What the left don’t understand is, they believe that this will be achieved through cultural Marxism, not an evolution in consciousness.

Radical centrists, liberal-conservatives, conservatives, nationalists, and many people on the right are actually less racist and nazi than they are. Especially the libertarian, ‘don’t tread on me’, and the minarchist types. If you compare these to the woke-hardline communists, then the communists are essentially closer to nazism because of their authoritarian tendencies, their fundamental psychology, and their attitude towards Isreal and Zionism.

The reason why liberation from the doctrine of either the state or the dictatorship of the proletariat brings you back to fundamental humanity is that, if the state or the dictatorship is the only thing standing between you being a horrible person (however this might be defined), then it’s a thin veil that is keeping you supposedly moral and ethically sound (or ideologically inline).

The colour blind approach, and the idea that a persons character is what matters, not their identity; that anyone might be a welcome contribution - just so long as the integrity of the nation, its cultural norms, its traditions, and its legal frameworks, are not overly compromised - is a scary thought for the Unholy Alliance.

As a result, Unholy Alliance creates a situation where the cultural integrity of the nation is compromised to such a degree that we see increases in knife crime, terror attacks, grooming gangs, forced marriage, rapes, riots, backlash, inter-ethnic conflict, and all sorts of other problems, including the widespread Energetic Sickness, or Mouse Utopia-like psychopathology and extremism amongst the population, especially the young.

Additional problems include the negation or denial of biological reality; the crazy notion - even amongst many scientists and so called rational thinkers - that the cultural complexities of human society and the human mind, somehow grant us special access to transcend fundamental biology.

And yet they do nothing about any of this insanity, in fact, they keep making it worse.

Because it benefits them.

And so we must ask;

Is there something more - something non-human - behind this agenda?

The real rǝvolution is remembering what it truly means to be human, and to advance in humanity.

ZISE/𒀱