Ever since Jacob Horne bombastically demanded we all apply mathematical models of thinking to cryptoeconomic structures sometime in early 2022, I have been deep in thought. If I’m being honest, it’s truly just been utterly captivating to me. Horne’s structured philosophy of hyperstructuralism is both elegant in its premises, easily adaptable to new paradigms within the cryptosphere, and endlessly scalable in modeling ever-growing structures. That said, I approach with a singular critique that perhaps the name is a bit too grand for what it accomplishes as it stops more or less at the protocol: No meta-entity could ever truly embody the label of being a hyperstructure by definition, as the network effects of the DAO may necessitate governance over non-hyperstructures simultaneously with their true cousins. I contend that hyperstructures can only ever exist at the DAO specific level (that is, that entity governing a protocol) and could never exist outside that: They are too narrowly defined to extend to higher levels and thus, I find the hyperstructure model to be limited in application beyond the singular, individual DAO. In this article, I hope to introduce a more defined set of models for metagovernance, what that looks like, how it might work, and thereby define the next logical step: Metastructures.