There are specific issues I had with how my former employer decided to part ways with me, and I want to write into code that this type of pump-and-dump investing with peopleâs lives and futures is not actually a form of benevolent dictatorship like \*\*\*\*\* may think, but instead a form of fascism in which you limit the speech of many in favor of elevating the speech of a few, all while crushing lives and making a toxic work culture in the process.
This isnât a trickle down economy where by allowing the faucet to pour to the less fortunate, you are begetting that good things happen without your influence. You must do the bare minimum to meet the needs of your people beyond money. This is why making good friends with Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk have been vital to \*\*\*\*\*. 
So, like those moguls, its important to make sure that itâs unclear how to actually come forward with critique. An employee comes forward with specific, limited critique. You respond not with calm, cool, collection. You loudly shout âgo find a new jobâ to please investors, while whispering âplease, donât leave meâ to keep internal chaos contained. You are telling the ones you like âget ready for layoffs, buy this coin to profit their loss, but donât tell anyoneâ. 
Itâs easy to think those who are dissenting have no critique to offer. Itâs fun to live in a hug-box, cause itâs all love. Alarmingly, many of the specific critiques in another post similar to this have come true. You have hired too fast, fired people, and now years afterwards, fabricate employee count while continuously relying on automation to displace workers possessing moral and ethical intent. The people in your management donât only have a condescending attitude, but itâs paired with being unable to take, digest, process, or reflect on criticism or things you have said in the past. Despite the $460 Million stock compensation costs, youâve failed to adhere to âtaking ownershipâ.